In The News

“Asset managers and consultants are closely watching how the U.S. presidential election could impact renewable energy investing.

Those with a focus on the sector are trying to discern whether politics around, and specific economic incentives borne out of, the Inflation Reduction Act and its myriad tax credits for clean energy will change after the November election.”

. . .

Regardless of what happens in November, managers and consultants who focus on renewables and infrastructure broadly said they are bullish on its future.

While a Trump win would be a shift for energy sector, “infrastructure as a whole has had a lot of bipartisan support, so I would be surprised if there weren’t good opportunities in infra going forward, and it’s hard to deny that no matter who’s in power,” said Larissa Davy, senior investment director of real assets at NEPC.

Her colleague Matt Ritter, partner and head of real assets Investments at NEPC, said the potential political and regulatory risk is something the firm is taking into account in its underwriting.

“The strategies that we’re recommending and looking at we believe are viable even if there were to be political or regulatory change,” Ritter said. “That’s not to say necessarily that every asset out there is in the same position, but we’re very focused on strategies that are not reliant on those subsidies or those sorts of programs to be viable.”

Even if the IRA tax credits were rolled back under a second Trump administration or Republican Congress, there are still viable investments in the renewable space, according to Davy.

“A fund investing today in renewable power is not going to suddenly not be profitable if Trump was to win this year going forward,” she said. “Over the long term that could change, but certainly that would have to be a consistent repeal of some of these types of policy agreements, like the IRA, over a 10-year term.”

Mikaylee O’Connor has joined investment consultant NEPC as principal and head of defined contribution solutions effective April 1, succeeding partner Bill Ryan who has been promoted to defined contribution team leader, a new position.

. . .

At NEPC, “I will be delving more into marketplace solutions,” she said. “I will be more directly involved with clients.”

She identified retirement income solutions, the impact of technology on plan management and plan governance as three areas of interest. Technology, for example, can be used to “better customize solutions” and can “improve participant engagement and outcomes,” she said.

Mikaylee O’Connor has joined investment consultant NEPC as principal and head of defined contribution solutions, the firm announced.

O’Connor will lead NEPC’s defined contribution practice and also oversee its defined contribution plan trends research and data analytics, guiding strategic initiatives related to managed accounts, retirement income solutions, target date funds and other investments, according to the firm.

. . .

“As a team, we are focused on helping our clients navigate and lead the discussion around issues relating to retirement income,” [Bill] Ryan said, in a statement. “Mikaylee’s extensive experience and deep expertise working with a diverse client set will position NEPC to continue identifying innovative solutions that help alleviate those concerns.”

NEPC has $1.6 billion in assets under management and advisement, according to the firm.

Despite benefiting from regulatory and commercial advances designed to make in-plan retirement solutions more attractive, defined contribution executives continue to wrestle with concerns about cost and complexity as well as compatibility among employers and record keepers.

. . .

To consultant William Ryan, the solution to an in-plan solution is hiding in plain sight: a target date series with a systematic distribution of assets upon retirement.

Ryan is a partner and head of defined contribution plan solutions at NEPC, which recently released an annual survey on DC plan trends and fees showing that people over 65 hold 45% of their assets in target-date funds. Among that age group, 68% have retired or left their employers.

“Unfortunately, only 26% have activated systematic distributions, but 26% is wildly greater than the 4% to 5% who annuitize,” Ryan said.

. . .

The words “retirement income” or “lifetime income” are subject to different interpretations, Ryan added. To NEPC, the words retirement income simply mean “getting money out of the plan to fund a paycheck,” he said. “It doesn’t need to mean guaranteed and it probably shouldn’t mean guarantee, insured, or annuity.”

However, “lifetime income” has become a synonym for “guaranteed income” — words that are “creatively interchanged by insurance companies,” he said.

“This is why we at NEPC think the industry has communicated the success and objective of retirement income very wrong,” Ryan added. “The narrative has become hyperfocused on needing to add commercial insurance to DC plans, when most participants are entitled to government retirement insurance via Social Security, and some get employer retirement insurance via a pension plan.”

“The Department of Labor appointed five members to its ERISA Advisory Council…”

. . .

The council’s new appointees, who will each serve three-year terms, are:

• William E. Ryan III, head of defined contribution for investment consultant, NEPC
• Anusha Rasalingam, a partner at law firm Friedman & Anspach
• Charles B. Wolf, a retired shareholder of law firm Vedder Price who teaches employee benefits law at the University of Chicago Law School
• Regina T. Jefferson, a law professor at the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
• Kathleen McBride, an accredited investment fiduciary analyst, and founder and president of FiduciaryPath

“Larissa Davy, a senior investment director on NEPC’s research team focused on infrastructure, has relocated from Boston to lead the firm’s newly opened London office.

CIO Tim McCusker said the Feb. 27 opening of the Boston-based consulting and investment firm’s London office, its first overseas, will bolster its coverage of global investment managers and strategies— with a focus on private markets — for NEPC’s predominantly U.S. client base.”

. . .

“Having a London office will also help NEPC better compete with investment consultants that have global footprints, he said.

While prospective clients reviewing NEPC’s research on non-U.S. managers and ideas about the global investment landscape typically come away thinking highly of the firm’s work, “we weren’t answering yes” to RFP questions about whether NEPC has overseas offices, McCusker noted. “We feel like we’re a very global organization and wanted to align that,” he said.”